24.prannai reddy

  Question no.1 https://23bonthadivya.blogspot.com/ 1)The reviews were very precise. the points highlighted and missing were mentioned clearly giving a clear review. Links of each review was mentioned which is very helpful to understand the review given.  2)peer has given a satisfactory presentation about the case and treatment 3)peer has given the positive view on reflection on tele medical learning  4)chief complaints were explained clearly QUESTION NO.2 . I haven't taken any review  Question no.3 Case no.1 http://srinaini25.blogspot.com/2021/07/srinaini-roll-no-33-3rd-semester-this.html .It is a case of AcuteCKD .The history is very detailed. The investigation pictures are provided accurately.  Case no.2 https://laharikantoju.blogspot.com/2021/07/58-year-old-male-patient-elog-lahari.html?m=1 .A CASE OF AkI  .presentation was very well done .everything was mentioned clearly along with pictures  CASE NO.3 https://krupalatha54.blogspot.com/2021/07/a-49-yr-old-female-with-generalize